CEREC® Materials vs. Traditional Dental Lab: What Every Dentist Should Know Before Choosing
CEREC® Materials vs. Traditional Dental Lab: What Every Dentist Should Know Before Choosing
Published by CAD/CAM Center Miami | Educational Series
If you've been considering CEREC® technology for your practice but aren't sure how its materials stack up against what your dental lab delivers, this guide is for you.
The question isn't whether CEREC® materials are good — the science is clear on that. The real question is: what are you giving up by not using them?
Let's break it down.
What Are CEREC® Materials?
CEREC® chairside systems mill restorations directly from prefabricated ceramic blocks. Over the past four decades, these materials have evolved dramatically. Today, three main categories dominate clinical use:
1. Feldspathic Ceramic (e.g., CEREC Blocs)
The original CEREC® material. Ideal for inlays, onlays, and veneers where esthetics are the priority. Excellent optical properties, highly translucent, and easy to adjust chairside. Best suited for anterior restorations and low-stress posterior situations.
2. Lithium Disilicate (e.g., IPS e.max® CAD, CEREC Tessera®)
The current gold standard for chairside CAD/CAM. IPS e.max® CAD demonstrates an average survival rate of 95.2% over a period of up to 15 years — a benchmark that rivals lab-fabricated ceramic restorations. Blocks are milled in a pre-crystallized (blue) state for easy machining, then crystallized chairside in as little as 14 minutes with a SpeedFire furnace. Indicated for crowns, onlays, veneers, and anterior/posterior single units.
3. Zirconia-Reinforced Lithium Silicate (e.g., Celtra Duo®)
This material exhibits increased flexural strength and chameleon-like aesthetics compared with standard lithium disilicate, with no additional crystallization step required after milling — making it one of the fastest chairside workflows available.
4. PMMA (Polymethylmethacrylate)
Used primarily for long-term provisionals and implant-supported restorations. Not a final material, but invaluable for complex cases requiring temporization while the definitive plan is confirmed.
The Traditional Lab Workflow: What You're Actually Comparing
When a dentist sends a case to the lab, the typical workflow involves:
- Physical impression or digital scan sent to the lab
- Model fabrication and die preparation
- Wax-up or digital design
- Material selection, pressing or milling, layering
- Glazing and staining
- Return shipping and second appointment for cementation
Turnaround: typically 7–14 business days. During this time, the patient wears a temporary restoration, which carries its own set of clinical risks (debonding, sensitivity, fracture, patient dissatisfaction).
CEREC® Materials vs. Lab: The Honest Comparison
Clinical Outcomes
The evidence supports chairside CAD/CAM as a legitimate clinical alternative. A systematic review and meta-analysis found that the biological, technical, and aesthetic behaviors showed similar clinical outcomes between CAD/CAM and conventional groups, with lithium disilicate showing notably strong clinical performance.
A 2025 retrospective cohort study comparing zirconia and lithium disilicate restorations over 5 years found cumulative survival rates of 94% and 89% respectively — with no statistically significant difference between the two materials in survival rates or technical complications.
In short: properly executed chairside restorations are clinically equivalent to lab work for the vast majority of single-unit indications.
Esthetics
This is where many dentists hesitate. The assumption is that a skilled ceramist at a lab will always produce a more esthetic result. For highly complex anterior cases with demanding esthetic requirements, that may still be true.
But for the bulk of everyday restorations — posterior crowns, onlays, inlays, and standard anterior cases — a well-executed CEREC® crown equals the quality and appearance of a well-done lab-fabricated crown.
Modern lithium disilicate blocks offer a wide shade range, multiple translucency levels (LT, MT, HT), and can be individualized with stains and glazes chairside before final crystallization.
Speed: The Undeniable Advantage
This is where CEREC® has no competition.
- Traditional lab: 7–14 days + 2 patient appointments
- CEREC® chairside: same-day delivery, single appointment possible
The chairside process using CEREC® avoids the final impression process, temporization process, and second dental appointment generally required to complete high-strength all-ceramic crowns from a dental laboratory.
For your patients, that means one anesthesia episode, no temporaries to manage, and a permanent restoration they walk out with the same day. For your practice, that means improved scheduling efficiency and a clear differentiator in your market.
Material Consistency
One underappreciated advantage of CAD/CAM blocks is manufacturing consistency. CAD/CAM approach has been introduced in dentistry as a precise, efficient, accurate and error-free tool to produce high-quality dental restorations, as opposed to the traditional way of manual manufacture, which is prone to numerous subjective errors.
Every block comes from a controlled industrial process. There are no voids, no porosity variations, and no technician-dependent inconsistencies in the core material.
Cost to the Practice
This is where the math becomes compelling over time. Lab fees for a PFM or all-ceramic crown typically range from $80–$200+ per unit depending on the lab and material. With chairside CAD/CAM:
- You control material costs (blocks typically range from $15–$40 per unit depending on material and supplier)
- You eliminate shipping and handling delays
- You recapture the lab margin
- You eliminate the cost of provisional materials and the clinical time to fabricate and cement them
When Should You Still Use the Lab?
CEREC® is not the answer for every case. There are situations where lab fabrication remains the better choice:
- Multi-unit bridges beyond 3 units — though CAD/CAM bridge blocks exist, complex span cases still favor lab workflow
- Full-mouth reconstructions requiring extensive vertical dimension changes and precise occlusal calibration
- Highly complex anterior esthetic cases where individual layering by a skilled ceramist adds clinical value the patient has explicitly prioritized
- Implant-supported full-arch cases with screw-retained components requiring milled titanium frameworks
For everything else — and that includes the majority of restorative dentistry done in a general practice — CEREC® materials are fully capable.
The Material Selector: Quick Reference
| Clinical Situation | Recommended CEREC® Material |
|---|---|
| Posterior crown, standard | Lithium disilicate (e.max® CAD or Tessera®) |
| Anterior crown, high esthetics | Lithium disilicate LT or feldspathic |
| Inlay / Onlay | Lithium disilicate or feldspathic |
| Veneer | Feldspathic ceramic |
| High-load posterior (bruxer) | Zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate |
| Long-term provisional | PMMA |
Ready to Stock Your CEREC® System?
If your practice already uses CEREC® technology — or you're evaluating it — having the right materials inventory matters. At CAD/CAM Center Miami, we carry the blocks used in the workflows described in this guide:
- CEREC® Blue Blocks — Lithium Disilicate (Qty: 5) — Pre-crystallized lithium disilicate for standard chairside milling workflows. Compatible with MCXL and MC X5 milling units.
- CEREC® LiSi Fully Crystallized Blocks — C14 (Qty: 5) — Fully crystallized lithium disilicate. No post-milling firing required. Ideal for practices optimizing single-visit workflow speed.
Both ship free in 2 business days on orders over $100. Browse the full CEREC® Supplies & Accessories catalog for burs, accessories, and more.
References
- Aswal GS, et al. Clinical Outcomes of CAD/CAM (Lithium disilicate and Zirconia) Based and Conventional Full Crowns and Fixed Partial Dentures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cureus. 2023. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.37888
- Topdagi B, et al. Comparison of Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Zirconia and Lithium Disilicate Prostheses: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Biomimetics. 2025. DOI: 10.3390/biomimetics10110740
- Ivoclar USA. IPS e.max CAD — Clinical Documentation. ivoclar.com/en_us
- Ionescu AM, et al. Evaluation of the Surface Properties of Three CAD/CAM Ceramics: A Comparative In Vitro Study. Dentistry Journal. 2025. DOI: 10.3390/dj13120550
- Davidowitz G, Kotick PG. The Use of CAD/CAM in Dentistry. Dent Clin North Am. 2011. PMC4402686
- Levin L, et al. Restoring Teeth with an Advanced Lithium Disilicate Ceramic: A Case Report and 1-Year Follow-Up. PMC9507783
CAD/CAM Center Miami is a certified pre-owned CEREC® equipment reseller serving dental professionals across the United States. This article is intended for educational purposes.